Monday, November 21, 2011
E tu, Twilight? A Question about the Foster Care Plot
Two of Bella's friends sit with her at the cafeteria table. In walk the "Cullens." A family but not your ordinary family. A family with five children where four of the five are dating each other, they are all around the same age, and none of them look alike. One girl describes one of the Cullens as looking "like he's always in pain" and then called another Cullen "weird."
How does an author or director explain how a family of children all about the same age don't look alike, and are dating?
They're foster kids! Of course!
*sigh*
It's OK, Twilight, I think I still love you.
Do you think it is a positive thing for Twilight to use foster care/foster kids as the theme for heroic characters in a movie?
(and no plot spoilers, I haven't read the books or seen the other movies yet!)
3 comments:
Please comment. I love hearing from you!
Commenting Guidelines:
--Feel free to respectfully agree or disagree, discuss with others, share how you felt, what you thought, what information you know, or something you've experienced.
--Anonymous commenting has been enabled for those who feel more comfortable commenting that way. Please put a little nickname, number, or alias of some sort with your anonymous comment to reduce confusion if multiple anons start commenting and discussing in the post at the same time.
--Word verification has been enabled to reduce spam. If you have difficulty seeing the verification, feel free to email me your comment at declassifiedadoptee [at] gmail [dot] com and I will post it for you.
I reserve the right to delete comments at my discretion.
Having trouble making a comment? Sometimes my blog host has technical difficulty. Try back later. If you came here from Networked Blogs on Facebook, go up to the top of the page and hit the little "x" on the right-hand side of the gray Networked Blogs tool bar to exit out of their frame. You should be able to comment then. If all else fails, email me and I will post your comment for you.

Never bothered me only because I always took it as the reason that made the most sense. They could have said other things, but the whole point was for them to seem "normal" and how do you explain it in a way other than "foster kids" so that people don't talk about it at home and with each other? I don't know, maybe I'm just not creative. Or maybe it came across better in the book... You'll have to let me know.
ReplyDeleteJenn, it didn't bother me all that much either. I too thought it would be the only way to explain how they are all together as a family. I just can't believe how I can't take two steps in either direction or turn on the TV without adoption/foster care in my face 24-7, especially when it is usually negative.
ReplyDeleteI like having foster kids as being heros in a movie.
I wish BJ Lifton were still alive to ask her opinion. She writes extensively on the role of adopted/abandoned children (which the Twilight characters weren't actually adopted or abandoned it was just their cover-up) being the Jungian "warrior" protype by personality or otherwise being put in a super-human role. She does it so much more justice in explanation that I do lol.
Amanda - I like that "fosters kids as being heros" - we are most often considered worthless or garbage - or just pathetic. I like that.
ReplyDeletePlease explain "Jungian "warior" protype" - LOL - I seriously don't want to dig the books out tonight!