Trace A. DeMeyer, an adoptee, is the author of One Small Sacrifice: Lost Children of the Indian Adoption Projects (2010) and Split Feathers: Two Worlds (pending publication). Read more at her blog: www.splitfeathers.blogspot.com.
“I am 72 years old. I was adopted into a white family at age one-and-a-half when my mother died. I realized I was different before I ever went to school. When I asked, my foster parents told me I was Indian, and from that day I identified with Indians, because that was what I was. I didn’t know who I was, and that heartache and anguish has been with me for nearly 70 years. I hope your study can help me find out who I am before I die. I don’t want to die not knowing my true identity. They sealed my birth certificate so I could never find my identity and never see my blood relatives. The pain of this is never ending.” – Participant in Split Feather Study by Carol Locust (Cherokee), 1998
November may be the month to promote more adoptions, but for North American Indians, adoption is and was a weapon of mass destruction which came in the form of the Indian Adoption Projects (IAP), developed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, a division of the federal government and the Child Welfare League of America.
The Indian Adoption Program was not a war, not a signed treaty, but their idea. This idea was highly effective since adopting out Indian children would be as destructive as war but it would last longer; it’d last a lifetime. IAP was not officially signed like other treaties made in Indian Country. IAP records were sealed and not made public. Adoptions would be permanent. Native children adopted by non-Indians parents would be Americans. Thousands of Indian children were placed in closed adoptions and wiped off tribal rolls. No one knows exactly how many children were affected.
A big black government sedan was reported in many abduction stories and it was not against the law or illegal. Social workers took some children to residential boarding schools. Others were placed in orphanages and foster homes, and others would be adopted.
William Byler testified before the Senate in 1974 to ask for what became the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978.
Here is some of his testimony:Senator ABOUREZK. Can you describe how removal of Indian children in adoption situation is accomplished
Mr. BYLER. I can cite certain kinds of experiences that we have had. One case, not too long ago in North Dakota, Indian children were living with their grandparents. Their grandmother was off doing the shopping. The grandfather was 3 miles away with a bucket getting water. While they were away, the social worker happened by at that time and found the children scrapping. When grandfather returned, the children were gone, and I don't know whether, in that case, he was ever successful in finding where the children were. I think they were placed for adoption somewhere. When that happens, Indian parents or grandparents are told this is confidential information. We cannot disclose to you where your children are. This makes is seem impossible for them to even try to do anything about it.
Senator ABOUREZK. You mean the children were taken from the home and the grandparents never were allowed to see them again or to try to fight the actions?
Mr. BYLER. That is correct, and as far as they knew, they never received any notice that there were proceedings against them or against the parents. This is very often the case, there is no notice given, or if notice is given, it is in such a form that the people who get the notice don't understand it; It does not constitute a real notice.
The Indian Child Welfare Act was passed in 1978 yet adoption practices and methods are still affecting tribal nations today. Tribes insist, over and over, they want to run their own programs to care for their children, but monies from the federal government are still channeled to the states instead of tribes in 2011. It doesn’t seem to matter how the tribes prefer their form of kinship adoption, when a child is placed with relatives and not strangers.
In the case of Adoption Awareness Month, those who interpret its value to society do so to protect and promote their myths, touting numerous benefits for the adoptee. Indian adoptees are called the Stolen Generations for a reason. It is undeniable our assimilation was America’s answer to Manifest Destiny, to make adoptees non-Indian and prototypes of American citizens, to destroy our future as tribal members.
Very few tribes have found success with economic development such as casino gaming; most suffer devastating cycles of poverty, the result of America's neglect and misguided programs. Americans caught a glimpse of our reality with Diane Sawyer's 20/20 program Hidden America: Children of the Plains on October 10. In case you missed it, watch a clip here: http://abcnews.go.com/2020/video/hidden-america-children-plains-14708439.
Pine Ridge (where 20/20 filmed over one year) is only one rez - many more Indian families suffer and are hidden right here in America. After the wars, Indian reservations were isolated for a reason - out of sight, out of mind; this is one reason why Indian Country has such severe epidemics and no one in America seems to know.
After National Public Radio’s three part investigation last week, their evidence proves the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 is not working as it was intended and enacted! Social services in 32 states are violating federal law and taking Indian children.
No, adoption in America is not something we celebrate in Indian Country.
My great grandmother, Louisa Wade Wetherill, was apposed to the boarding schools and the things that they did. She fought it on the Navajo Reservation. She raised, in the Navajo community where she lived, some Navajo girls that were orphans - as her own, but as Navajo.
ReplyDeleteTo take an Indian child from their culture is to commit murder.... murder of the spirit of the child, the family, the tribe.....
The residential schools in Canada were an equal disgrace. Not only were children removed from their culrute and their parents, many of them were sexually abused as well.
ReplyDeleteObviously the fact that the gov used to do this is disgusting and shameful.
ReplyDeleteThere is a problem now though, in that the Act still exists and is being abused by the tribes.
I have heard of several cases where the tribe tried to take a child out of the adoption process and claim it as it its own, using the Act.
In one specific case, the child was in the process of being placed, the birthparents had made the choice, chosen the parents for the open adoption etc, and because the blond/blue eyed child had the smallest amount of Indian blood in him, the tribe contested the adoption.
Both birthparents were as far removed from the reservation as Santa Claus - did not identify themselves as Indians in the least. But great-great-great-great-great somebody had, and because of that, the tribe had rights to the child OVER the wishes of the birthparents. They appeared in court twice and then, for the final hearing, no showed, so the adoption went ahead as the birthparents desired it to.
It is absolutely ridiculous and just as akin to kidnapping as the atrocities that were committed before the Act.